Conclusion
To conclude, sterilising disabled children is a responsibility that has been placed upon the shoulders of the family courts as a result of Marion's case. This has caused controversy as it is seen as unethical not allowing parents to make decisions regarding the health of their child. The law is a social mechanism for change and due to advancements in technology it is recommended that the law be changed to provide a law that provides far more flexibility in decisions made for the disabled child by the parents.
Technology has developed significantly over the past decades and as presented, Australia's legal system has not maintained satisfactory laws for our society and as a
result, ethics have created conflict. This website has looked at these ethics and made recommendations to improve the current dilemma between technology and the law.
Technology has developed significantly over the past decades and as presented, Australia's legal system has not maintained satisfactory laws for our society and as a
result, ethics have created conflict. This website has looked at these ethics and made recommendations to improve the current dilemma between technology and the law.